Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Loyal to a fault

Por: Heintzman, Ralph.
Ottawa Sumit Group 2010Ottawa Centre on Governance 2010Descripción: 12 páginas.Tema(s): SERVICIOS PÚBLICOS | SECTOR PÚBLICO | MODELOS ECONÓMICOS | FORMACIÓN PROFESIONAL | ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA | FUNCIÓN PÚBLICA | FUNCIONARIOS PÚBLICOS | DERECHOS DE AUTOR | GESTIÓN PÚBLICA -- ANUARIO | GASTO PÚBLICO | IGUALDAD DE GÉNERORecursos en línea: Haga clic para acceso en línea
Contenidos:
Introduction -- Loyalti as a virtue -- Loyalty as a virtue in organizational life -- Loyalty in public organizations: normative considerations -- Is the question: how much? Or to what? -- Public service loyalty: empirical considerations -- Getting loyalty right
En: Optimun Online 2010. Volumen 40 Número 1, p. 48-60Resumen: In this article, the author argues against the idea that there is "growing evidence" of "a higher degree of passive and active disloyalty of federal bureaucrats duly elected government of the day" (Hubbard and Paquet, 2009: 64). Maintains that there is no solid evidence to support that proposition. In fact. I think the evidence shows otherwise. Displays a public service that is completely loyal to the elected government of the day - but too often on a narrow rather than a broad way. This leads to a paradox that is critical to understand for the future of the public service. The narrow loyalty to the government of the day that has become characteristic of the federal public service does lead to a sort of disloyalty. But it is a disloyalty of a very different kind – a disloyalty to something other than the elected government of the day, but equally important, a disloyalty to its own mission and values, and to the public interest – especially the public interest in an impartial public service.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Introduction -- Loyalti as a virtue -- Loyalty as a virtue in organizational life -- Loyalty in public organizations: normative considerations -- Is the question: how much? Or to what? -- Public service loyalty: empirical considerations -- Getting loyalty right

In this article, the author argues against the idea that there is "growing evidence" of "a higher degree of passive and active disloyalty of federal bureaucrats duly elected government of the day" (Hubbard and Paquet, 2009: 64). Maintains that there is no solid evidence to support that proposition. In fact. I think the evidence shows otherwise. Displays a public service that is completely loyal to the elected government of the day - but too often on a narrow rather than a broad way. This leads to a paradox that is critical to understand for the future of the public service. The narrow loyalty to the government of the day that has become characteristic of the federal public service does lead to a sort of disloyalty. But it is a disloyalty of a very different kind – a disloyalty to something other than the elected government of the day, but equally important, a disloyalty to its own mission and values, and to the public interest – especially the public interest in an impartial public service.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Contáctenos:
Correo: biblioteca@servir.gob.pe
Dirección: Av. Cuba 699, Jesús María, Lima, Perú
Central telefónica: (511) 2063370 | 0-800-10024 (línea gratuita) anexo 2703